Army Suspends Germ Research at
Maryland Lab
By SCOTT SHANE
Published: February 9, 2009
The New York Times
WASHINGTON — Army officials have suspended most
research involving dangerous germs at the biodefense laboratory at Fort
Detrick, Md., which the F.B.I.
has linked to the anthrax attacks of 2001, after discovering that some
pathogens stored there were not listed in a laboratory database.
The
suspension, which began Friday and could last three months, is intended
to allow a complete inventory of hazardous bacteria, viruses and toxins
stored in refrigerators, freezers and cabinets in the facility, the
Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases.
The
inventory was ordered by the institute’s commander, Col. John P.
Skvorak, after officials found that the database of specimens was
incomplete. In a memorandum to employees last week, Colonel Skvorak
said there was a high probability that some germs and toxins in storage
were not in the database.
Rules for keeping track of pathogens
were tightened after the 2001 anthrax letters, which killed five
people. But pressure to improve recordkeeping and security at the Army
institute intensified six months ago after the suicide of Bruce E.
Ivins,
a veteran anthrax researcher, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s
announcement that prosecutors had been preparing to charge Dr. Ivins
with making the deadly anthrax powder in his laboratory there.
A
spokesman for the institute, Caree Vander Linden, said an earlier
review had located all the germ samples listed in the database. But she
said some “historical samples” in institute freezers were not in the
database, and the new inventory was intended to identify them so they
could be recorded and preserved, or destroyed if they no longer had
scientific value.
One scientist, who spoke on the condition of
anonymity because he was not authorized to comment, said samples from
completed projects were not always destroyed, and departing scientists
sometimes left behind vials whose contents were unknown to colleagues.
He said the Army’s recordkeeping and security were imperfect but better
than procedures at most universities, where research on biological
pathogens has expanded rapidly since 2001.
The suspension will
interrupt dozens of research projects at the institute, whose task is
to develop vaccines, drugs and other measures to protect American
troops from germ attacks and disease outbreaks. Ms. Vander Linden said
some critical experiments involving animals — often used to test
vaccines and drugs — would not be halted.
News of the suspension,
first reported Monday by the Science magazine blog ScienceInsider,
comes as the Justice Department has been interviewing scientists at the
Army institute to prepare the government’s legal defense against a
lawsuit filed by the family of Robert Stevens, the Florida tabloid
photography editor who was the first to die in the 2001 letter attacks.
That
lawsuit, filed in 2003 and delayed by the government’s unsuccessful
efforts to have it dismissed, accuses officials of failing to assure
that anthrax bacteria at Fort Detrick and other government laboratories
were securely stored. Dr. Ivins was not suspected in the attacks at
that time, but the F.B.I.’s conclusion last year added new weight to
the lawsuit’s claims.
The F.B.I. has released evidence of Dr.
Ivins’s mental problems and of a genetic link between the mailed
anthrax and a supply of the bacteria in his laboratory. But many of Dr.
Ivins’s former colleagues at the Army institute have said they are not
convinced that he mailed the letters.
The F.B.I. has asked the National Academy of Sciences
to convene a panel of experts to review its scientific work on the
case, and the bureau and academy are completing a contract for the
review, said an academy spokesman, William Kearney.
The anthrax
case has underscored the threat of biological attack by biodefense
insiders like Dr. Ivins, who have access to pathogens and the expertise
to work with them.
The number of such researchers has grown
rapidly since 2001, when the anthrax letters set off a spending boom on
biodefense that led to a rapid addition of laboratories working on
potential bioweapons, notably anthrax.
Before 2001, only a few dozen such facilities worked with
anthrax. Today, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
has registered 219 laboratories to do so, said an agency spokesman, Von
Roebuck. He said 10,474 people had been cleared to work with dangerous
pathogens and toxins nationwide after background checks by the Justice
Department.
----------
A version of this article appeared in print on February 10, 2009, on
page A16 of the New York edition.
|